Should the nation go down the drain?

What is it for?

Last month I was on a family Zoom call. Remarking how amazing it was to see family in three countries and two continents, the patriarch said, "When the telegraph reached Texas to Maine, Thoreau asked, 'But what do Maine and Texas have to say to each other?'"

I remarked, "He was prophetic."

Seven years after Thoreau made his observation in Walden (here's the exact quote), Maine and Texas were on different sides of the Civil War. I wonder if Maine and Texas ever did have anything to say to each other. If one left the Union, would the other miss it?

I'm writing this on July 7, the birthday of the late science fiction writer Robert Heinlein, born in 1907. In a 1961 speech, he said,

"I also think there are prices too high to pay to save the United States. Conscription is one of them. Conscription is slavery, and I don't think that any people or nation has a right to save itself at the price of slavery for anyone, no matter what name it is called. We have had the draft for twenty years now; I think this is shameful. If a country can't save itself through the volunteer service of its own free people, then I say: Let the damned thing go down the drain!"

If a national government must sacrifice the people's freedom to preserve itself, it doesn't deserve to exist. While the U.S. no longer has an active draft, I agree with Heinlein that some prices are too high to save the country, such as endless wars and mass surveillance.

But notice that Heinlein didn't say reform, abolish, or replace the government. He said let the nation "go down the drain." To let something happen is to be passive. It means doing nothing to make it happen, or to stop it from happening. Don't crack skulls on behalf of the regime, but don't blow up buildings in an attempt to overthrow it either.

I wonder what would happen if the nation as we know it did go down the drain. It would mean no more foreign wars. No more mass surveillance. Selective Service would be gone, and with it even the possibility of a draft. 

This is why Maine and Texas had to be in the same union, so that the nation would be big enough and powerful enough to engage in non-defensive, foreign wars. The camaraderie of war veterans helped make us “one nation,” but who were they protecting when they risked their lives overseas? Your freedom? Or the interests of Wall Street?

To end the wars, maybe the nation will have to go down the drain.

Or maybe not.

Either way, I wouldn't use force. Peace and freedom are more important than nations and their governments.

James Leroy Wilson writes from Nebraska. Follow him on Facebook and Twitter. If you enjoy his articles, subscribe and exchange value for value. You may contact James for your writing, editing, and research needs: jamesleroywilson-at-gmail.com. Permission to reprint is granted with attribution.

For sports-only content, subscribe to The MVP Chase.